Moxibustion for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22286. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022286.

Abstract

Background: At present, the effect of western-medicine (WM) therapy to treat diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is limited. Moxibustion is a representative external treatment in traditional Chinese medicine that has been beneficial to DPN. We aim to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of moxibustion in treating DPN, following PRISMA guidelines.

Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched to acquire information on eligible trials published from inception to June 1, 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying moxibustion therapy with a minimum of 14-days treatment duration for DPN patients compared with placebo, no intervention, or conventional WM interventions. The primary outcomes in our study include the sensory-nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and motor-nerve conduction velocity (MNCV). We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool to assess the methodological quality of eligible RCTs. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The χ test was applied to assess the heterogeneity.

Results: In total, 11 RCTs were included that involved 927 DPN patients. Compared with the control group, there was an increase in median MNCV (MD = 6.26, 95% CI 2.64-9.89, Z = 3.39, P = .0007) and peroneal MNCV (MD = 6.45, 95% CI 5.30-7.61, P < .00001). There was also an increase in median SNCV (MD = 6.64, 95% CI 3.25-10.03, P = .0001) and peroneal SNCV (MD = 3. 57, 95% CI 2.06-5.09, Z = 4.63, P < .00001) in the treatment groups. The treatment groups receiving moxibustion therapy indicated a more significant improvement in total effectiveness rate (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.37, Z = 7.16, P < .00001). Toronto Clinical Scoring System indicated a significant decrease in the treatment groups (MD = -2.12, 95% CI -2.82 to 1.43, P < .00001). Only 1 study reported that treatment groups experienced no adverse reactions. The other 10 studies did not mention adverse events.

Conclusions: Moxibustion therapy may be an effective and safe option for DPN patients but needs to be verified in further rigorous studies.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Databases, Factual
  • Diabetic Neuropathies / therapy*
  • Drug Therapy / standards
  • Duration of Therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medicine, Chinese Traditional / adverse effects
  • Medicine, Chinese Traditional / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Moxibustion / adverse effects
  • Moxibustion / methods*
  • Neural Conduction / drug effects*
  • Neural Conduction / physiology
  • Peroneal Nerve / physiopathology
  • Placebos / administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Safety
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Western World

Substances

  • Placebos